Repeat after me: This is not a sequel. This is not a sequel.
This is not a sequel. There, that should do it.
If you’ve ever heavily revised your own work, or had someone
help you with that process, you should know that the end product is sometimes
very different from the original piece. You take what works, ditch the rest,
rework it til you get a worthy product. That’s exactly what happened with Go
Set a Watchman turning into TKAM. If you are a TKAM lover you will recognize
pieces of it in GSAW. It’s curious just from a writer’s perspective that some
characters and events that are iconic in TKAM are just little bits of memory in
GSAW and some of them don’t have the same results. I won’t say more for those
of you that like to remain unspoiled about such things. So from one perspective,
it’s a fun intellectual game to go through and spot those elements.
Writing-wise it is not strong. There’s not a lot of reason
within GSAW to care about the characters if you don’t already love them from
reading TKAM. I do find the plot intriguing: a woman in her young 20’s who has
left her home in Maycomb to make a new life in New York City, coming to visit
every so often, and struggling with belonging, loyalty, and identity. If you’ve
ever realized the flaws in something you once held as idyllic, then you will
relate to Jean Louise on some level.
It’s written in third-person limited from Jean Louise’s perspective, and we get bits of her childhood background told in flashbacks throughout the narrative. Some you’ll recognize; some you won’t. Some of the characters’ behavior and actions will prove to you that it’s not a sequel, if you didn’t already get that through your head. There are inconsistencies that wouldn’t be there (presumably) if this was a true sequel. The relationship between Scout and her aunt, for instance, is not believable in the context of how it ended in TKAM and how you might fill in the blanks that they learned to value each other despite their very different perspectives. If you remember that GSAW came first, this shouldn’t bother you though.
Now for the controversy. Much of the conflict is driven by
characters’ responses to the Supreme Court decision to force integration in the
South. Is Atticus a racist? I say no, in a semi-spoilery explanation. (THIS IS
YOUR SPOILER ALERT!)
One of the themes of TKAM is seeing things from another’s
perspective; getting in their shoes and walking around in them for awhile. How
would a southern gentleman from ALABAMA respond to this situation? The lines
being thrown around the internet as proof that Atticus is a racist are taken
greatly out of context. Uncle Jack explains some of what appears to be Atticus’s
racism to Jean Louise. She has discovered what she thinks is this great flaw in
her father and Uncle Jack helps her work it out. Atticus went to a Klan meeting
once but it was just to see who was involved so he could stand up to them if
need be. The quotes regarding Atticus asking Scout if she wants the black
population invading their social spaces or whatever is VERY much being cherry
picked to drum up hysteria. In context, he’s meaning that question as they are
right now in that moment. It’s actually an interesting commentary on what
happens to communities who have change forced upon them by the Supreme Court
and other distant groups with no understanding of the actual people and the
consequences then put on all involved, rather than letting states lead through
organic mind-changing and persuasion, (Wait, that sounds vaguely familiar…) His
point is that of course he views everyone as equal, but neither group, white or
black, is ready for integration because the white community needs to work
through their bitterness and the black community needs to learn skills to
survive in this society now. You can’t litigate your way into knowing how to
run a store, hold office, etc. Scout is angry that the people of Maycomb aren’t
doing more for the black community, but Atticus’s perspective is that you can’t
rush it. They both don’t like the Supreme Court decision. You can interpret
that as “racist” through our modern lens but it fits their character. It would
be unbelievable and poor writing to write southern characters in that era as
progressive. The conflict between Scout and Atticus actually reminds me of
George Washington Carver and WEB DuBois’ disparate views on how to successfully
integrate. Carver wanted to go peaceably, slowly, through education and with a
long end-game, to show the white community that the black community was
valuable and worth bringing into the fold, so to speak, while DuBois was much
more on the we’re here and you better like it end of things. (That is a really
rough summary of their perspectives, so sorry, history buffs.) It’s an accurate
look at how people thought about a serious issue. You can’t force a heart
change and culture shift with a law.
It’s a quick read because the writing is simple and the
narrative is not complex. There is cussing, just fyi. If you’re curious, read
it, keeping in mind that IT IS NOT A SEQUEL. It’s not going to be a classic but
it’s worth one reading.